You are viewing:

  1. » Home
  2. » BTL Blog
  3. » Poisonous drug or pharmaceutical benefit: Who decides?


Jump down to: content, section menu, site menu or site info sections.


Poisonous drug or pharmaceutical benefit: Who decides?

law books

Although drugs can be developed for beneficial medical reasons, some have harmful and dangerous effects. The use of potentially dangerous drugs is restricted or banned to promote public health and safety. 

The legal process of doing this is by “scheduling” the drugs, which is basically listing the drugs in groups according to the level of access the public has to them. The National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee (NDPSC) decides how to classify and schedule the drugs.

This committee consists of technical experts, representatives from various interest groups, and State and Territory government members.

The decisions of the NDPSC are recorded in the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons (SUSDP).  The SUSDP then forms the basis for state laws about access to and legality of drugs. 

The aim is to promote a uniform scheduling of substances throughout Australia. From June, the SUSDP will be known as the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP). 

In order to assess the risk and benefit of certain drugs and to determine the appropriate level of public access to drugs and medicines, the NDPSC will consider certain factors, which include:

·         How toxic is the substance?

·         What are the risks and benefits?

·         What are the potential hazards?

·         What is the extent and patterns of use of a substance?

·         What is the dosage and formulation of a substance?

·         Is access to such a substance necessary? The NDPSC is to take into account the toxicity of the substance compared with other substances that are available and have a similar purpose.

·         What is the potential abuse of a substance?

·         What are the purposes for which the substance is to be used?

·         Any other matters the Committee considers necessary to protect public health, including risks of death, illness or injury resulting from use of the substance.

The substances are listed in the Poisons Standard, in Schedules 1 to 9 in order of increasing degree of restriction.  For example, drugs in schedule 2 – 4 can be sold in pharmacies, whereas drugs listed on schedules 5 – 9 cannot. 

Schedule 9 substances are the most restricted because they are considered to be most likely to be abused or misused.  They are prohibited under the law, except when required for medical or scientific research, and teaching or training purposes with approval of the governmental Health Authorities. 

It is this Schedule 9 that contains the illegal recreational drugs, also known in some states as ‘drugs of dependence.’  These include ecstasy, heroin, ice and marijuana.

The Committee meets three times a year to discuss changes to the SUSDP, such as including new drugs on the Schedule.  The Committee advertises its agenda ahead of the meetings, to invite the public to comment on the upcoming decisions.  

The next meeting of the Committee is in June.  You can find the agenda on this site: http://www.tga.gov.au/ndpsc/index.htm.  At this meeting, one of the issues the Committee is going to discuss is whether mephedrone (Miaow Miaow) should be scheduled. 

The decisions of the Committee will be published in a gazette available on the same website.

 

Written by the National Children’s and Youth Law Centre – for more information on your legal rights check out www.lawsutff.org.au

Jump to top

1 Comment

Coco

4 months ago

I think the drug classification system is a bit of a joke. Why is tobacco and alcohol legal and cannabis not?

The effects of alcohol are far more damaging than marijuanna. Plus, the illegal aspect of cannabis makes it a little more tempting to kids whereas if it was widely available and taxed fewer kids would feel any need to try it.

Email this page

The following message will be sent to your friend:

<Your name> thought you might be interested in this page:
http://www.betweenthelines.net.au/blog/poisonous-drug-or-pharmaceutical-benefit-who-decides

They said:

Personal note
You can add a personal note to the end of your email

Not a member?
Join Between the Lines to access a range of great member features.

Forgot your password?

Browse by tags

  1. acid
  2. addiction
  3. addictive personality
  4. adhd
  5. advertising
  6. AFL
  7. alcohol
  8. amphetemines
  9. amy winhouse
  10. anorexia
  11. anti-drug
  12. anxiety
  13. big day out
  14. binge drinking
  15. bisexual
  16. blood alcohol limit
  17. bongs
  18. boundaries
  19. brett stewart
  20. brittany murphy
  21. caffeine
  22. cannabis
  23. celebrity
  24. censorship
  25. co-morbidity
  26. cocaine
  27. coke
  28. community
  29. crime
  30. crystal Meth
  31. culture
  32. dance party
  33. depression
  34. disclosure
  35. DMT
  36. drink spiking
  37. drinking age
  38. driver testing
  39. driving
  40. drug education
  41. drug testing
  42. drug trends
  43. drugs
  44. ecstasy
  45. effect
  46. effects
  47. energy drinks
  48. environment
  49. ethics
  50. experimentation
  51. fbi
  52. febfast
  53. festivals
  54. friends
  55. future music festival
  56. gateway
  57. gay
  58. GHB
  59. government
  60. hallucinogens
  61. harm minimisation
  62. harm reduction
  63. health
  64. Hep C
  65. hepatitis
  66. heroin
  67. hipsters
  68. ice
  69. income
  70. injecting
  71. international drug laws
  72. internet
  73. interviews
  74. junk food
  75. KAVA
  76. ketamine
  77. know your limits
  78. law
  79. legal highs
  80. legalisation
  81. lesbian
  82. LSD
  83. marijuana
  84. matthew stokes
  85. media
  86. medicinal
  87. mental health
  88. meow
  89. mephedrone
  90. methamphetamine
  91. MGMT
  92. music
  93. music festivals
  94. nature
  95. news
  96. nurture
  97. overdose
  98. parties
  99. peer education
  100. personal
  101. personal stories
  102. pills
  103. police
  104. police search
  105. policy
  106. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  107. pot
  108. poverty
  109. pre and post loading
  110. psychedelics
  111. punishment
  112. queer
  113. radio
  114. recruit
  115. reformed
  116. regular drug use
  117. rehab
  118. research
  119. rights
  120. risk
  121. ritalin
  122. role model
  123. rugby league
  124. safe partying
  125. schoolies
  126. schools
  127. sharing equipment
  128. sideways
  129. sleep
  130. smart drugs
  131. sms
  132. sniffer dogs
  133. speed
  134. sponsorship
  135. sport
  136. sports
  137. subculture
  138. survey
  139. the streets
  140. therapeutic
  141. transgender
  142. trends
  143. trips
  144. video
  145. war on drugs
  146. wasted
  147. wealth
  148. wellbeing
  149. what is in drugs
  150. zero-tolerance