You are viewing:

  1. » Home
  2. » BTL Blog
  3. » Refeer madness!


Jump down to: content, section menu, site menu or site info sections.


Refeer madness!

Reefer madness_del_2010-01-11T00:51:39+00:00

By Sky Croeser

How does an educational movie funded by a church group become a cult classic? In 1936 a church group funded production of a film called Tell Your Children, which was meant to educate parents about the dangers of marijuana. It's a ridiculous movie. As public education films go it's right up there with Duck and Cover, which advises you to 'duck and cover' in the case of nuclear war.

The opening sequence begins by warning parents about “the frightful toll of the new drug menace”, “Marihuana”. It goes on to describe marijuana as “a violent narcotic” that is “more vicious, more deadly” than even heroin and opium. Marijuana, according to the film, causes “dangerous hallucinations” and “emotional disturbances” followed by “the loss of all power to resist physical emotions”, leading to “acts of shocking violence” and “incurable insanity”. The film continues in a similar vein, depicting marijuana as causing murder, suicide and rape, not to mention untidiness.

It's difficult to take the film seriously today, but in the 1930s there was considerable concern about marijuana. It was commonly blamed for causing users to “go crazy and become violent; men would rape and kill under the influence, and women would become  promiscuous”  (Goode in Isralowitz 2005, 105). Some audiences, at least, must have taken Tell Your Children at its word when it claimed that “the dread Marihuana may be reaching forth next for your son or daughter... or yours... or YOURS!”

Today, attitudes towards marijuana have changed. By 1995, only 29 per cent of survey respondents thought that marijuana was “part of the 'drug problem'”, while 42 per cent  thought possession of marijuana for personal use should be legal  (Makkai & McAllister 1997, 74 & 77). Anti-marijuana campaigners still invoke the threat of insanity, at least in the form of schizophrenia, but on the whole the focus has shifted to looking at the effects of marijuana on school or sporting performance, or to arguing that marijuana is a 'gateway drug' that will lead users to take other drugs.

Tell Your Children was bought by another producer in the 1970s, re-cut, and re-named Reefer Madness. It's become a cult classic, and I'm willing to bet that a good proportion of people who watch it today watch it stoned. Once, it might it have been convincing. Today, when around 33 per cent of Australians have smoked marijuana (AIHW 2004, 4), most people realise that it doesn't lead to 'incurable insanity', 'dangerous hallucinations', or 'acts of shocking violence'. Tell Your Children tried so hard to scare viewers into avoiding marijuana use that it became a joke.

What's the lesson in all this? At the beginning of Tell Your Children, an anti-marijuana campaigner claims that “only through enlightenment can this scourge be wiped out”. That's half right. People need to hear the evidence on drug use: the real facts, not horror stories. Unfortunately, even though anti-drug campaigns have been toned down they still rely on claims that taking drugs will ruin your life. After all, it's difficult to design posters and tv ads that begin by saying “It'll mostly be okay if you smoke pot, but there are some risks...”

It may not be as catchy, and it certainly doesn't make for hilarious viewing, but unless anti-drug campaigns get more realistic there will always be stoners watching them and giggling.

 

References

2009, 'Australian Anti-Drug Ad Campaigns' Daily Motion viewed 27 June 2009.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2004, 2004 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: first results”, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, viewed 6 July 2009. 

Erceg-Hurn, D 2008, 'Drugs, money and graphic ads: a critical review of the Montana Meth project', Prevention Science, Vol. 9, pp. 256 – 263.

1951 'Duck and Cover', viewed 6 July 2009

Isralowitz, R 2003. 'The use of marijuana in the United States:  reflections ', Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, Vol. 3 (4), pp. 105 – 107.

Makkai, T & McAllister, I 1997, 'Marijuana in Australia: patterns and attitudes',  Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, viewed 6 June 2009.

Murray, R, Morrison, P, Henquet, C & Di Forti, M, 2007, 'Cannabis, the mind and society: the hash realities', Nature Reviews, Vol. 8, pp. 885 – 895.

1936 'Reefer Madness' viewed 6 July 2009.

Jump to top

1 Comment

wastedsedated

over 2 years ago

I'd recommend strongly that people read an article called "The marajuana conspiracy" makes for very informative reading. mostly about the U.S but gives a good insight into why its illegal. 

Email this page

The following message will be sent to your friend:

<Your name> thought you might be interested in this page:
http://www.betweenthelines.net.au/blog/refeer-madness

They said:

Personal note
You can add a personal note to the end of your email

Not a member?
Join Between the Lines to access a range of great member features.

Forgot your password?

Browse by tags

  1. acid
  2. addiction
  3. addictive personality
  4. adhd
  5. advertising
  6. AFL
  7. alcohol
  8. amphetemines
  9. amy winhouse
  10. anorexia
  11. anti-drug
  12. anxiety
  13. big day out
  14. binge drinking
  15. bisexual
  16. blood alcohol limit
  17. bongs
  18. boundaries
  19. brett stewart
  20. brittany murphy
  21. caffeine
  22. cannabis
  23. celebrity
  24. censorship
  25. co-morbidity
  26. cocaine
  27. coke
  28. community
  29. crime
  30. crystal Meth
  31. culture
  32. dance party
  33. depression
  34. disclosure
  35. DMT
  36. drink spiking
  37. drinking age
  38. driver testing
  39. driving
  40. drug education
  41. drug testing
  42. drug trends
  43. drugs
  44. ecstasy
  45. effect
  46. effects
  47. energy drinks
  48. environment
  49. ethics
  50. experimentation
  51. fbi
  52. febfast
  53. festivals
  54. friends
  55. future music festival
  56. gateway
  57. gay
  58. GHB
  59. government
  60. hallucinogens
  61. harm minimisation
  62. harm reduction
  63. health
  64. Hep C
  65. hepatitis
  66. heroin
  67. hipsters
  68. ice
  69. income
  70. injecting
  71. international drug laws
  72. internet
  73. interviews
  74. junk food
  75. KAVA
  76. ketamine
  77. know your limits
  78. law
  79. legal highs
  80. legalisation
  81. lesbian
  82. LSD
  83. marijuana
  84. matthew stokes
  85. media
  86. medicinal
  87. mental health
  88. meow
  89. mephedrone
  90. methamphetamine
  91. MGMT
  92. music
  93. music festivals
  94. nature
  95. news
  96. nurture
  97. overdose
  98. parties
  99. peer education
  100. personal
  101. personal stories
  102. pills
  103. police
  104. police search
  105. policy
  106. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  107. pot
  108. poverty
  109. pre and post loading
  110. psychedelics
  111. punishment
  112. queer
  113. radio
  114. recruit
  115. reformed
  116. regular drug use
  117. rehab
  118. research
  119. rights
  120. risk
  121. ritalin
  122. role model
  123. rugby league
  124. safe partying
  125. schoolies
  126. schools
  127. sharing equipment
  128. sideways
  129. sleep
  130. smart drugs
  131. sms
  132. sniffer dogs
  133. speed
  134. sponsorship
  135. sport
  136. sports
  137. subculture
  138. survey
  139. the streets
  140. therapeutic
  141. transgender
  142. trends
  143. trips
  144. video
  145. war on drugs
  146. wasted
  147. wealth
  148. wellbeing
  149. what is in drugs
  150. zero-tolerance